Back to Blog
    Market AnalysisBy Stefan Tan 4 min readPublished

    Sydney restaurant technology: Square leads POS and ordering

    Sydney restaurant technology: Square leads POS and ordering

    Square leads both visible POS systems and direct online ordering in Sydney. EatClub leads loyalty, while SevenRooms and OpenTable are level at 35% among venues found on a booking platform.

    Key findings

    • Square runs 44% of the venues where a POS system was identified and Square Online reaches 23% of venues with direct online ordering.
    • Loyalty, rewards and discount programs appear at 14% of Sydney restaurants, cafes and bars in this city view.
    • EatClub reaches 64% of venues with a loyalty, rewards or discount program.
    • Among venues found on a booking platform, SevenRooms and OpenTable each reach 35%, followed by Now Book It at 26% and ResDiary at 6%.

    Sydney restaurants do not run on one technology stack. The system at the counter, the direct ordering channel, the loyalty offer and the booking platform each have a different competitive shape.

    Square is the clearest cross-layer leader. It runs 44% of the venues where a POS system was identified, while Square Online reaches 23% of venues with direct online ordering. Loyalty is more concentrated: EatClub reaches 64% of venues with a loyalty, rewards or discount program. Booking has no clear leader, with SevenRooms and OpenTable each at 35%, followed by Now Book It at 26% and ResDiary at 6% among venues found on a booking platform.

    Restaurant technology reaches different parts of the market

    Loyalty, rewards and discount programs have the broadest visible reach in this city view. They appear at 14% of Sydney restaurants, cafes and bars. Direct online ordering appears at 11%, while a POS system can be identified at 10%.

    Bar chart showing the share of Sydney restaurants, cafes and bars with each technology signal: loyalty, rewards and discounts 14%, direct online ordering 11%, POS identified 10%.

    The three layers sit close together in reach, but not in structure. A platform can lead one layer without owning the restaurant's wider technology relationship. That is why a city-wide restaurant technology view needs the POS, ordering, loyalty and reservation categories side by side.

    Explore the broader restaurant technology data hub, including restaurant POS data, restaurant loyalty data and restaurant reservation data.

    Square leads POS, but the long tail matters

    Square runs 44% of the venues where a POS system was identified. Redcat follows at 20%. Abacus and Lightspeed each hold 6%.

    That shape matters for technology partnerships. Square offers broad reach across independent cafes and restaurants. Redcat is a sizeable second pole, while Abacus and Lightspeed add distinct groups of operators. The remaining share is spread across a long list of systems, which makes venue-level identification valuable for any supplier selling integrations or add-ons.

    For a cross-city comparison, read which POS systems restaurants run in New York, Amsterdam and Sydney.

    Direct ordering follows the POS leader

    Square Online leads direct online ordering with 23% of venues where a direct ordering channel was found. A venue or group website accounts for 13%, Redcat Online Ordering 10% and Nextorder 7%.

    The overlap between POS and ordering gives Square a strong position at both the counter and the digital checkout. Yet the 13% share for restaurant-owned websites shows that the vendor behind an order is not always visible in the brand presented to the guest.

    Loyalty has a different centre of gravity

    EatClub reaches 64% of venues with a loyalty, rewards or discount program. Velocity x me&u and Hey You each reach 13%, followed by Entertainment at 12%.

    This is a different market from POS. The leading loyalty and discount products sit closer to consumer discovery, offers and repeat visits than to the till itself. For the broader city comparison, see restaurant loyalty programs in New York, Amsterdam and Sydney.

    Restaurant booking has no clear leader

    SevenRooms and OpenTable each reach 35% of Sydney venues found on a booking platform. Now Book It follows at 26%, ResDiary at 6% and Obee at 2%. Some restaurants use several booking platforms, so these shares overlap.

    Bar chart showing the top share in four Sydney restaurant technology layers: EatClub has 64% of venues with loyalty, rewards or discounts; SevenRooms and OpenTable each have 35% of venues found on a booking platform; Square has 44% of venues with an identified POS; Square Online has 23% of venues with direct ordering.

    The booking view is useful for platform sales teams and for suppliers that integrate with reservations. See the reservation platform market share overview for the category view.

    What restaurant technology teams should do

    1. Segment by installed system. A POS integration pitch belongs with venues running that POS, not with a generic restaurant list.
    2. Treat each layer separately. The loyalty leader is different from the booking frontrunners, and the ordering leader does not control every direct channel.
    3. Look for stack combinations. A venue running one product can be a stronger prospect for an adjacent integration, ordering tool or guest product.

    Dashmote maps restaurant technology to the venue across 60+ countries. Book a demo to see the same city view for your target market.

    Another city read: how Singapore restaurants take bookings.

    Want to see these insights in action?

    Discover how Dashmote can help your team make smarter, data-driven decisions.