Back to Blog
    InsightsBy Stefan Tan 7 min readPublished

    Dashmote launches POS Material Detection: who owns the bar in London, from photos

    Illustration of a pub, outside and in, with a detection box around each piece of branded POSM (the fascia sign, the terrace parasol, a table talker, the fridge, the back-bar display, the beer font, the bar mat and the glassware), each labelled with its material type and a placeholder brand, feeding a results card for London: branded drinks material is visible in the photos of 74% of bars and pubs and 23% of restaurants; Guinness (Diageo) leads the most bars and pubs (25%, runner-up Heineken 9.5%), and Coca-Cola the most restaurants (9.9%, runner-up Heineken 2.6%).

    POS Material Detection shows whose POS material (POSM) is on the taps, glasses, fridge and terrace in venue photos: all of London, with a London Soho close-up.

    Key findings

    • About three in four London bars and pubs show branded drinks material, against about a quarter of restaurants.
    • Guinness (Diageo) leads London's bars and pubs; set Guinness aside and Heineken is narrowly ahead of Asahi, 14% vs 13%.
    • Coca-Cola leads London's restaurants and carries about four in five pieces of their branded fridge material; it leads the restaurants of about three in four boroughs, though borough samples are small.

    Drinks companies pay to be seen in bars, and they do it with POS material (POSM): the branded taps, fridges, parasols and glasses in a venue. Until now, knowing whose POSM stands where meant sending someone in.

    Brands have asked us for this for years. Checking POSM used to be a job for the sales rep: walk in, look around, write it down. Now much of it can be done before the visit, and where it cannot, the rep takes one quick photo.

    Dennis Tan, CEO & Co-Founder, Dashmote

    Today we are launching POS Material Detection. Until now, Dashmote could show where a drinks brand is available: on the menu and on the delivery apps. Now we also show where it is visible, in the branded material inside the venue. It reads venue photos, finds the branded objects and tells you which brand, and which company, owns each one.

    Our first study covers all of London, from the West End to the outer boroughs. About three in four London bars and pubs show branded drinks material in their photos; about a quarter of restaurants do. In bars and pubs, Guinness (Diageo) leads. In restaurants, Coca-Cola leads, and about three in four restaurants show no branded drinks material in their photos. That gap is the opportunity.

    How it works: from a photo to an owner

    How POS Material Detection works, in four illustrated steps: 1, collect the public photos of each venue; 2, read every photo, boxing each piece of branded material and naming its type and brand; 3, profile every venue: which brands are visible, and on what; 4, roll up by area: which brand leads where, and where the lead is narrow. Brands A, B and C are placeholders.

    Illustration: a pub with branded material from three placeholder brands, A, B and C.

    1. Collect the photos. Public photos of each venue are gathered, and every finding keeps its photo and its date. The photos your reps take on store visits are read the same way; this study uses public photos only.
    2. Read every photo. Each piece of branded material becomes a line of data: what it is, which brand, which company. A font reading Peroni Nastro Azzurro becomes "beer font, Peroni, Asahi".
    3. Profile every venue. Per outlet, you see which brands are visible and on what: the taps, the glasses, the fridge, the terrace.
    4. Roll it up by area. Per neighbourhood, borough or region, you see who leads, the runner-up, and whether the lead is clear or narrow.

    Bars and pubs carry the branding; restaurants mostly do not

    About three in four London bars and pubs show branded drinks material (74%), against about a quarter of restaurants (23%). Diageo's brands are in about 55% of bars and pubs, Heineken's in 36%, Asahi's in 26%, AB InBev's in 22% and Molson Coors' in 21%. In restaurants no beer company shows in more than about 3.0%; Coca-Cola is the name you see most, in about 11%. These shares count what the photos show, so they understate presence where a venue has few photos: among bars and pubs with 40 or more recent photos, 85% show branded drinks material, and among restaurants, 33%.

    Chart titled "London: about three in four bars and pubs show branded drinks material, about a quarter of restaurants". Two grids of 100 venues show the share with any drinks brand visible in photos, then a dot pair per company shows the share of venues where its branded drinks material is visible in photos, bars and pubs filled and restaurants open; a venue can show several companies. Any drinks brand 74% and 23%; Diageo 55% and 2.1%; Heineken 36% and 3.0%; Asahi 26% and 2.3%; AB InBev 22% and 2.0%; Molson Coors 21% and 2.5%; Coca-Cola 12% and 11%.

    Share of venues whose public photos show each company's branded drinks material, weighted to all of London. Bottles and cans on show are not counted.

    Donut chart pair titled "Diageo's brands carry the most branded drinks material in bars and pubs; Coca-Cola's carry about a third of it in restaurants": share of all branded drinks material seen, by the company that owns the brand, each venue type adding up to 100%. Bars and pubs: Diageo 22%, Heineken 17%, Asahi 13%, Molson Coors 8.2%, AB InBev 7.6%, other companies 33%. Restaurants: Coca-Cola 32%, Heineken 11%, Asahi 9.1%, Molson Coors 6.7%, PepsiCo 6.0%, AB InBev 5.9%, Diageo 5.6%, other companies 24%.

    Share of all branded drinks material seen, by the company that owns the brand, weighted to all of London: unlike the share of venues above, each venue type adds up to 100%. A brand counts once per type of object per venue.

    Who leads the bar: Guinness (Diageo)

    In about a quarter of London's bars and pubs (25%), Diageo's brands, almost all of them Guinness, carry the most branded drinks material; the runner-up, Heineken, leads in about one in ten (9.5%). The same picture holds in Inner London and, less sharply, in Outer London. These leader figures count venues with at least 20 recent photos, which is about three in four bars and pubs and about three in five restaurants.

    The lead is Guinness. Diageo's brands show in about 55% of bars and pubs; set Guinness aside and the rest of Diageo's range shows in about 7.6%. Without Guinness, Heineken is narrowly ahead of Asahi: 14% vs 13%, a gap within sampling noise.

    Chart titled "London's bars and pubs: Guinness (Diageo) leads": share of bars and pubs where each company or brand has the most branded drinks items. By company, with Guinness: Diageo 25%, runner-up Heineken 9.5%, Diageo leads. By company, with Guinness set aside: Heineken 14%, Asahi 13%, Heineken narrowly ahead. By brand: Guinness 30%, runner-up Peroni 2.4%, Guinness leads.

    Share of bars and pubs with at least 20 recent photos where the company or brand has the most branded drinks items, weighted to all of London. Narrowly ahead: the gap to the runner-up is within sampling noise.

    Guinness: the brand you see most

    Guinness is in about half of London's bars and pubs (53%); the next brand, Peroni, is in about 15%. Guinness is also the single most-displayed brand in about 30% of bars and pubs; no other brand is top in more than about 2.4%, and in about one in five no single brand stands out. Behind it come Heineken's brands (Birra Moretti, Amstel, Cruzcampo and Beavertown) and Asahi's (Peroni, London Pride and Asahi).

    Bar chart titled "Guinness is in about half of London's bars and pubs; next comes Peroni, in about one in seven": share of bars and pubs whose public photos show each brand, coloured by owner. Guinness (Diageo) 53%; Peroni (Asahi) 15%; Birra Moretti (Heineken) 12%; Coca-Cola 11%; Amstel (Heineken) 10%; Asahi 10%; Camden (AB InBev) 9.6%; London Pride (Asahi) 8.7%; Cruzcampo (Heineken) 8.6%; Beavertown (Heineken) 8.3%.

    Share of bars and pubs whose public photos show the brand on branded drinks material, weighted to all of London.

    Where the branding sits: the taps, then the glass

    The taps carry about 44% of all the branded material seen in London's bars and pubs, glassware 24%: together, about two thirds. On the taps themselves the space is shared: Heineken's brands hold about 19% of the branded tap material, Asahi's 16%, Diageo's 14% and Molson Coors' 11%. Diageo is in the most bars; on the tap row itself, Heineken and Asahi hold more of the branded material.

    Restaurants spread their branding differently: glassware 28%, signs and decor 15%, terrace and front 13%, taps 13% and fridges 11%. The fridge matters far more there than in bars and pubs (0.8%), and about four in five pieces of branded fridge material in London's restaurants (81%) carry a Coca-Cola brand, against about 8.7% for PepsiCo.

    Pie of pie chart titled "Bars and pubs put their branding on the taps, shared between the brewers; in restaurants most branded fridges carry Coca-Cola": per venue type, a donut of all branded drinks material seen by type of object, with the taps (bars and pubs) and the fridges (restaurants) split by company in a second donut. Bars and pubs: taps 44%, glassware 24%, signs and decor 10%, terrace and front 6.6%, mats and coasters 6.5%, back bar 3.7%, table promotion 2.7%, fridges 0.8%, other 1.7%. Taps in bars and pubs, by company: Heineken 19%, Asahi 16%, Diageo 14%, Molson Coors 11%, AB InBev 7.0%, other owners 32%. Restaurants: glassware 28%, signs and decor 15%, taps 13%, terrace and front 13%, fridges 11%, table promotion 5.7%, back bar 4.7%, mats and coasters 4.5%, other 4.4%. Fridges in restaurants, by company: Coca-Cola 81%, PepsiCo 8.7%, other companies 10%.

    Share of all branded material seen, by type, weighted to all of London; company shares are of that type's branded material. A brand counts once per type of object per venue.

    Restaurants: Coca-Cola leads, and most show no branded material

    Coca-Cola leads London's restaurants, in Inner and Outer London. Among restaurants with at least 20 recent photos, it carries the most branded drinks material in about one in ten (9.9%); no other company leads in more than about 2.6%.

    But about three in four London restaurants (77%) show no branded drinks material in their photos: no branded taps, fridges, glassware or signs (bottles and cans on show are not counted). Part of that is what the photos miss, but it marks white space for drinks brands, and a ready call list.

    Who leads where in London

    Guinness (Diageo) leads the bars and pubs of every London sub-region, and Coca-Cola the restaurants. The lead is clear in Central and East London's bars and pubs and in Central, East and West London's restaurants. Elsewhere it is a narrow lead, within sampling noise: in North London's bars and pubs, Guinness 24% vs Heineken 20%; in South London's restaurants, Coca-Cola 9.6% vs Molson Coors 4.2%. Read the regional figures as indicative: the samples are smaller than London's.

    Map titled "Who leads where: Guinness (Diageo) in bars and pubs, Coca-Cola in restaurants": London's five sub-regions, each coloured by its leader, the company with the most branded drinks items in the most venues, in full colour for a clear lead and a lighter shade for a narrow lead, with the leader's share and the runner-up's. All London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 25%, runner-up Heineken 9.5%; restaurants Coca-Cola 9.9%, runner-up Heineken 2.6%. Inner London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 25%, runner-up Heineken 9.1%; restaurants Coca-Cola 7.2%, runner-up Heineken 3.2%. Outer London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 24%, runner-up Asahi 12%; restaurants Coca-Cola 15%, runner-up Molson Coors 3.4%. Central London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 25%, runner-up Asahi 8.3%; restaurants Coca-Cola 6.6%, runner-up Heineken 3.1%. East London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 27%, runner-up Heineken 11%; restaurants Coca-Cola 12%, runner-up Asahi 2.4%. North London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 24%, runner-up Heineken 20%, narrow lead; restaurants Coca-Cola 8.5%, runner-up Asahi 4.5%, narrow lead. South London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 22%, runner-up Heineken 14%, narrow lead; restaurants Coca-Cola 9.6%, runner-up Molson Coors 4.2%, narrow lead. West London: bars and pubs Guinness (Diageo) 26%, runner-up Asahi 16%, narrow lead; restaurants Coca-Cola 16%, runner-up Molson Coors 4.7%.

    Share of venues with at least 20 recent photos where the company has the most branded drinks items, weighted. Every area is coloured by its leader; a lighter shade is a narrow lead, where the gap to the runner-up is within sampling noise. Sub-region and Outer London figures are indicative.

    Borough by borough: restaurants, indicative

    Coca-Cola leads the restaurants of about three in four London boroughs. Borough samples are small, so these figures are indicative: only in Camden is its lead clearly larger than sampling noise, and elsewhere it is a narrow lead. In the other boroughs another company leads, narrowly, among them Molson Coors in Sutton, Harrow and Croydon and AB InBev in the City of London and Hackney.

    Map titled "Coca-Cola leads the restaurants of about three in four London boroughs; its lead is clear in Camden": London's 33 boroughs, each coloured by the company with the most branded drinks items in its restaurants, full colour for a clear lead and a lighter shade for a narrow lead or a level result, indicative. Barking and Dagenham: Coca-Cola 17% vs Red Bull 9.2%, narrow lead; Barnet: Coca-Cola 9.3% vs Asahi 9.0%, narrow lead; Bexley: Coca-Cola 26% vs Molson Coors 7.3%, narrow lead; Brent: Coca-Cola 9.7% vs AB InBev 6.7%, narrow lead; Bromley: Coca-Cola 11% vs Heineken 7.3%, narrow lead; Camden: Coca-Cola 12% vs Molson Coors 3.6%, clear lead; City of London: AB InBev 13% vs Bacardi 6.7%, narrow lead; Croydon: Molson Coors 9.9%, narrow lead; Ealing: Coca-Cola 17% vs Molson Coors 4.0%, narrow lead; Enfield: Coca-Cola 8.6% vs Diageo 8.5%, narrow lead; Greenwich: Coca-Cola 21% vs Molson Coors 4.9%, narrow lead; Hackney: AB InBev 3.6% vs Heineken 3.4%, narrow lead; Hammersmith and Fulham: Coca-Cola 28% vs Heineken 6.0%, narrow lead; Haringey: Coca-Cola 7.6% vs Boon Rawd (Singha) 5.7%, narrow lead; Harrow: Molson Coors 9.0% vs Coca-Cola 5.3%, narrow lead; Havering: Coca-Cola 16% vs PepsiCo 12%, narrow lead; Hillingdon: Coca-Cola 16% vs Molson Coors 8.7%, narrow lead; Hounslow: Coca-Cola 28% vs Anadolu Efes 3.2%, narrow lead; Islington: Coca-Cola 12% vs Asahi 3.5%, narrow lead; Kensington and Chelsea: Coca-Cola 3.8% vs Nestlé 3.4%, narrow lead; Kingston upon Thames: Coca-Cola 21% vs Diageo 7.7%, narrow lead; Lambeth: Coca-Cola 13% vs HiteJinro 3.3%, narrow lead; Lewisham: Coca-Cola 12% vs Heineken 11%, narrow lead; Merton: Coca-Cola 14% vs Asahi 8.6%, narrow lead; Newham: Coca-Cola 9.8% vs Asahi 8.5%, narrow lead; Redbridge: Coca-Cola 27% vs PepsiCo 3.6%, narrow lead; Richmond upon Thames: Nestlé 6.9% vs Asahi 6.3%, narrow lead; Southwark: Heineken 3.9% vs Asahi 2.8%, narrow lead; Sutton: Molson Coors 29% vs Coca-Cola 20%, narrow lead; Tower Hamlets: Coca-Cola 6.5% vs PepsiCo 4.1%, narrow lead; Waltham Forest: Carlsberg Britvic and Coca-Cola level, 8.7% each; Wandsworth: Diageo 4.9% vs Karma Drinks 4.0%, narrow lead; Westminster: Coca-Cola 4.0% vs AB InBev 3.8%, narrow lead.

    Company with the most branded drinks items in restaurants with at least 20 recent photos, by borough, weighted. Indicative: borough samples are small. Every borough is coloured by its leader; full red: Coca-Cola's lead is clear; lighter shades: a narrow lead, where the gap to the runner-up is within sampling noise, or a level result where both print the same share.

    Close-up: London Soho

    In London Soho, the bar is more contested. In the neighbourhood of London Soho and West Fitzrovia, 70% of bars and pubs show branded drinks material. Diageo's brands show in 56%, close to London's 55%, but Heineken's show in 40% and AB InBev's in 36%, against 36% and 22% across London, and Diageo is only narrowly ahead of Heineken: 18% vs 13% of bars and pubs. Its restaurants show less: about one in six (17%) show branded drinks material, against 23% across London.

    Across the 33 busiest neighbourhoods we read in depth, Diageo's brands are the ones seen in the most bars and pubs in all but two.

    What drinks brands should do

    Find the white space. About three in four London restaurants show no drinks-brand material in their photos: room to be the first brand in, and a ready call list.

    Know where the lead is narrow. Borough by borough, Coca-Cola's lead in the restaurants of most boroughs is narrow, and without Guinness, Heineken is only narrowly ahead of Asahi in London's bars and pubs.

    See where a rival's kit stands and yours does not, before the visit.

    See it for your outlets

    Being stocked is not the same as being seen. This shows brands not only where they are on the menu, but where they are actually visible in the venue.

    Dennis Tan, CEO & Co-Founder, Dashmote

    The manual audit is the dull part of a rep's job. Skip it, and the time in the venue goes to selling. POS Material Detection shows the POSM in every outlet in your territory, alongside cooler detection and the outlet execution audit. Book a demo or get in touch.

    About this study: public venue photos of bars, pubs and restaurants (outside the big restaurant chains) in a sample of neighbourhoods across all 33 London boroughs, with 33 of the busiest neighbourhoods read in depth; photographed over the two years to 2026 and weighted to all of London. Photos your reps take on visits are read the same way. A brand counts once per type of object per venue. A company leads a venue when it has the most branded drinks items there, counted on venues with at least 20 recent photos, and an area's leader is the company that leads the most venues there; where its gap to the runner-up is within sampling noise, it is a narrow lead. A photo shows what was visible, not when it was installed; it cannot show what nobody photographed, and visibility is not sales.

    Want to see these insights in action?

    Discover how Dashmote can help your team make smarter, data-driven decisions.